Resources and examples
Access practical tools and templates for impact management
As part of its consensus-building efforts for good impact measurement and management, the IMP has developed practical guidance, partnered with organisations to develop case studies, and championed others whose measurement and management approach demonstrates the norms agreed through the IMP. This page of resources and examples has been developed to support enterprises and investors working to better understand their impacts on people and the planet.
If you would like to submit content for this page, please complete this short form to initiate the process. Note that we accept:
- Reports and case studies that demonstrate the integration of the IMP norms into an enterprise or investor’s impact measurement and management practice
- Open source guidelines that enable organisations to better understand their impacts
- Academic papers or research articles that aim to advance progress in the area of ESG and impact measurement, management and disclosure
- Databases of research and evaluations around impact measurement and management, that promote best practice and transparency in reporting data.
IRIS+ and the five dimensions of impact
This document describes the core concepts and structure for measuring and understanding impact according to the five dimensions of impact, through the use of both IRIS+ Core Metrics Sets and the IRIS Catalog of Metrics.
Actis Impact Measurement Methodology
This short video, as an accompaniment to the Impact.is.the.new.normal report, explains the Actis Impact Score and how its methodology is informed by different dimensions of impact.
Impact.is.the.new.normal.
Actis created its own rating system, the Actis Impact Score, to help investors make comparisons across sectors and geographies throughout their portfolios. Actis used the norms agreed through the IMP’s consensus-building work to create a framework that considers all dimensions of impact.
Managing impact at scale in a blended private markets portfolio
This case study follows the process and outcome for how and why Partners Group integrated the IMP norms into PG LIFE, its impact-at-scale strategy.
Growing a culture of social impact investing in the UK
This report highlights progress against recommendations on building a culture of social impact investing in the UK.
Creating well-defined outcomes
This standard is designed to help organisations know how to collect the information needed about ‘changes’, and how to analyse this information in order to produce a set of well-defined outcomes.
MetODD-SDG
This assessment tool enables mission-driven businesses to measure their contribution to the SDGs..
人们如何叙述自己亲身经历的影响
Impactt 咨询公司在缅甸、肯尼亚、比利时和玻利维亚举办了焦点小组，旨在推动影响力管理项目，了解人们在购买或使用自认为所需要的产品和服务时，怀有怎样的预期。
企业为联合国可持续发展目标做出何种贡献?
影响力的共同原则有助于我们在合作中获取清晰可靠的信息，从而提升办事效率。要了解企业对可持续发展目标所作的贡献，首先我们需要了解影响力的五个维度。
在单一资产类别领域内构建基于有效影响力-财务边界的投资组合
上述所说的基本原则用于描述不同基础业务或业务组合对人与地球环境的影响，它有助于投资者了解每种资产类别中适用的不同选项。基于此，投资者便可以构建一个符合其意图、约束、财务和影响力目标的投资组合。
基于玛氏公司的社会经济影响方法探索影响力管理项目的共同原则
玛氏公司是影响力管理项目的顾问方。此番，我们与全球可持续发展副总裁凯特·怀利 (Kate Wylie) 一起探讨了玛氏公司在影响力管理方面的心得，并重点探讨了“收入”这一领域。此番交流将作为我们本期指南的主题。
巴西的经验
本文件总结了Vox Capital于2017年6月9日和20日举办的两次会议上所呈现的新见解，与会者包括来自巴西影响力投资领域的基金经理、企业家、资产所有者和中介人。
影响力目标
随着影响力管理工作的触角伸向更为广泛的领域，我们更有必要了解彼此的期望并就如何最好地衡量和管理绩效达成共识。为了达成上述共识，我们一直致力于促进不同学科、地理和世界观的人之间进行虚拟和面对面对话。
影响力管理共识
影响力的管理有赖于我们对不同的人究竟受到何种影响的认知，这其中就包括:受影响的人，制造影响力的商业人，提供资金、支持和服务的人，以及那些通过政策, 学术或评估而实施影响力的人。
我们如何构建将影响力目标和财务目标与投资者的意图及限制相匹配的投资组合
上述所说的基本原则用于描述不同基础业务或业务组合对人与地球环境的影响，它有助于投资者了解每种资产类别中适用的不同选项。基于此，投资者便可以构建一个符合其意图、限制、财务和影响力目标的投资组合。
我们如何知道影响是否已经发生?
上述所说的基本原则用于描述不同基础业务或业务组合对人与地球环境的影响，它有助于价值链上的不同参与者找出管理这些影响所需的信息。在决定改善人类和地球环境之前，首当其冲的便是要收集好影响力的证据，从而弄清楚将会发生哪些实质性的正面和负面影响。
投资影响力分类指南
本文就如何使用投资者影响力矩阵来分类投资产品影响力提供指导。
探索受益人与客户对影响的预期
Social Spider 就该项目进行了一系列个人访谈和两次焦点小组讨论。访谈和焦点小组以一系列问题和提示为指导，请参见附录。
案例研究-浅谈离网能源筹备
本案例研究重在分析Acumen对离网能源领域的投资，强调收集影响力各维度数据的价值和重要性，旨在帮助投资经理全面落实影响力管理。